<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Fort Hood</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.milehimama.com/2009/11/05/fort-hood/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.milehimama.com/2009/11/05/fort-hood/</link>
	<description>Disorganized Discombobulated Devoted</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 23:42:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Marie</title>
		<link>http://www.milehimama.com/2009/11/05/fort-hood/comment-page-1/#comment-2779</link>
		<dc:creator>Marie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 15:03:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.milehimama.com/?p=1061#comment-2779</guid>
		<description>I would point out that this isn&#039;t &quot;reporting&quot; as such, what you get on your twitter.  You posting about it is more akin to &quot;reporting&quot;.  No opinion here yet on whether that&#039;s a good or a bad thing, but I think the future, if it lies here, lies in there not being any reporting.  Just a lot of observations passed on, without collection or checking an cross-checking, without investigation.  Considering how thoroughly reporters have dropped the ball in recent years, this may be a good development, but it&#039;s too bad if we&#039;ve come to that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would point out that this isn&#8217;t &#8220;reporting&#8221; as such, what you get on your twitter.  You posting about it is more akin to &#8220;reporting&#8221;.  No opinion here yet on whether that&#8217;s a good or a bad thing, but I think the future, if it lies here, lies in there not being any reporting.  Just a lot of observations passed on, without collection or checking an cross-checking, without investigation.  Considering how thoroughly reporters have dropped the ball in recent years, this may be a good development, but it&#8217;s too bad if we&#8217;ve come to that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
